The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is reviewing a case challenging Arizona’s election integrity laws concerning ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting.
In 2016, Arizona passed HB 2023 to restrict ballot harvesting in Arizona unless the person collecting the ballot is a family member, a person living in the same household, or a caregiver. Since the 1970s, Arizona has required people to vote at their specific precinct.
General Brnovich intervened on behalf of Arizona after the Secretary of State refused to defend the measures.
The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) is asking SCOTUS to bring clarity to these matters after a misguided ruling by the Ninth Circuit struck the measures down.
The High Court heard oral arguments on March 2, 2021.
For the latest on hearing dates and filings, monitor Brnovich v DNC on the SCOTUS website.
AGO Briefs
November 30, 2020 Brief of State Petitioners
November 30, 2020 Joint Appendix
April 27, 2020 Cert Petition to SCOTUS
April 27, 2020 Appendix
Amicus Briefs
Below is a list of seventeen Amicus Briefs filed in December 2020 in support of SCOTUS reversing the Ninth Circuit’s ruling.
- 11 United States Senators led by Texas Senator Ted Cruz
- 17 State Attorneys General led by Ohio AG Dave Yost
- House Speaker Rusty Bowers, Senate President Karen Fann, and Governor Doug Ducey
- State Legislative Leaders led by Missouri Representative Elijah Haahr
- Wisconsin Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald and Speaker Robin Vos
- South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem
- United States Department of Justice – Solicitor General
- Former Maricopa County Recorder Helen Purcell
- Election Integrity Project California and Arizona
- Pacific Legal Foundation
- The Cato Institute
- Public Interest Legal Foundation
- American Constitutional Rights Union
- Liberty Justice Center
- Judicial Watch, Inc. and Allied Educational Foundation
- Republican Governors Public Policy Committee
- Honest Elections Project
In June 2020, fourteen amicus briefs were filed from national and local leaders urging SOCTUS to accept the case.
Case History
In 2016, the Democratic National Committee challenged Arizona’s laws restricting ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting. A federal district court judge ruled in Arizona's favor and upheld the laws. The case was then appealed to a 3-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court, and that panel also upheld Arizona's laws. The DNC then appealed the case to a larger group of Ninth Circuit Court judges, who struck down the laws, a mere four days before the 2016 General Election. AG Brnovich immediately appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court and the very next day, the High Court overruled the Ninth Circuit, reinstating Arizona’s ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct laws, pending a full hearing of the merits in the lower court.
Late in 2018, a federal district court judge once again upheld Arizona’s laws after a 10-day trial. DNC attorneys appealed the case to a 3-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit, who again upheld Arizona's laws. DNC again appealed the case to a larger group of Ninth Circuit judges, and the court reversed itself in early 2020 and struck down the laws just as ballots for the Democratic Presidential Preference Election were beginning to be mailed out. AG Brnovich immediately filed for a stay of the decision, and the Ninth Circuit granted the request, leaving Arizona's restrictions on ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting presently intact.
In late April of this year, General Brnovich asked SCOTUS to rule on Arizona’s laws being challenged.
Press Releases
Attorney General Brnovich Defends Arizona Election Integrity Measures at U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Supreme Court Will Hear Arizona Ballot Harvesting Case
AZAG’s Office Receives Outpouring of Support in Ballot Harvesting Case Supreme Court Case
Attorney General Brnovich Asks Supreme Court to Rule on Ballot Harvesting Case