Civil Rights Litigation Section: Lawsuits

The Civil Rights Division's Litigation Section is responsible for enforcing the Arizona Civil Rights Act, the Arizona Fair Housing Act and the Arizonans with Disabilities Act. The Section achieves this objective through informal conciliation efforts and also through filing lawsuits seeking enforcement of these laws. Below are a sampling of the lawsuits brought by the Division to enforce Arizona's civil rights laws and the results obtained from those lawsuits.

Housing

Employment

Arizonans with Disabilities Act

Public Accommodation


Housing

State v. Aimco (disability) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. BAZV (disability) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Del Castillo (sex) (Complaint) (Default Judgment)
State v. Equity Residential (disability) (Consent Decree)
State v. Mlynarcyzk (race/color) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Old Concho(disability) (Complaint) (Consent Judgment)
State v. Ogorzaly (race/color) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Perno (familial status) (Complaint)
State v. The Scottsdale Condominium Association (disability) (Complaint)(Consent Decree)
State v. Sale (familial status) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Show Low Apartments (disability/service animal) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Sunland Village (religion) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Town of Payson (disability) (Complaint) (Judgment)
State v. Villatree Apartments (race/religion) (Complaint)
State v. WDOP Sub LLP (disability) (Complaint) (Consent Judgment)
State v. William Lyon Homes (race) (Consent Decree)


Employment

State v. ASARCO, L.L.C. (sex/retaliation) (Complaint)
State v. Bannon Springs (race/retaliation) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. CitiFinancial (sex) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. DHL (sex/retaliation) (Complaint) (Order) (Order 2)
State v. Drexel Diesel (sex/retaliation) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Jesko A/C Services, L.L.C. (sex/retaliation) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Marana Health Center, Inc. (sex) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Pima County (disability) (Complaint)
State v. SW General, Inc. (race) (Complaint) (Settlement Agreement)
State v. Tucson Residential Foundation (disability) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Tucson Unified School District (sex/retaliation) (Complaint)
State v. Twin Peaks (sex/retaliation) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Zimbow Enterprises, Inc. (sex/retaliation) (Complaint)


Arizonans with Disabilities Act

State v. Aloha Shuttles (transportation) (Finding of Fact)
Stave v. Buggy Inn, L.L.C. (service animal) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Copy Shop (service animal) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Family Health (service animal) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Harkins Amusement Entertainment Inc. (Access to Movie Theaters) (Complaint) (Joint Notice of Appeal) (Order)(Opening brief)
State v. Marquee Theaters (Access to Movie Theaters) (Complaint) (Settlement Agreement)
State v. Saban Rent a Car (transportation) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)


Public Accommodation

State v. Big Dan's Drive Thru (religion) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Indo-American (national origin) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. The Phoenix Country Club (sex) (Complaint) (Settlement Agreement)
State v. Vermillion Candy Shoppe (religion) (Complaint) (Consent Decree)
State v. Village of Oak Creek Community Church of the Nazarene, Inc. (religion) (Preliminary Injunction )